(5)
|
conversation
a leaf falls,
to remind me |
*
*
*
"In this world of illusion, why cling to anything? Desire
only leads to suffering." The ancient masters of wisdom
spoke such words often. And I have learned to understand at
least to some degree what they meant, not only in philosophical
terms, but experientially as well. This world is an illusion
set afloat in the midst of a void; this reality is but a dream.
As a human being, I have the capacity to understand this. I assume
that nonhuman animals perceive reality as unyieldingly real, solid,
and irrefutable; they have – so I presume – no adjunct understanding
of its illusory quality. It's also true, however, that I do not
know for certain what the experiential understanding of nonhuman
animals consists of, what layers or facets of perception they may
have that I do not share. Moreover, the reality/illusion/dream
perception that I do have is, so to speak, "merely" human:
it's only one of many perceptions possible, each variant of
perception, or variant mode of perception being, in an absolute
sense, equally valid. The only thing that's certain is that for
me, it's my human perceptions and realizations which form the
basis from which I must approach living in this world and within this reality.
Yet the relationship I have with reality rests upon a paradox.
While my human mode of perception has a causal effect in its ability
to influence reality, my perception itself is but a mere effect that
the rest of reality has upon me: I am not only the dreamer,
but also that which is dreamed. My perceptions are the effect of
my mind, my mind the effect of my brain, my brain the effect of my
body, and the effect of my body, down to its every last itch, belch,
and yawn, is a mere facade given to the Void. At the center of
"I" exists the "not-I"; this is what my human
capacity reveals to me. The more truly I know this, the more
profoundly I realize it, the more there is enacted a reciprocal
effect, constituted by the power of my realization to exert an
influence upon the rest of reality. However, since the rest of
the world – the other components which make up this reality – has its
own self-generating causality, a causality which exists separately
from me, it is not, and could never be, subject to my will.
Thus the only way to formulate my relationship to this world is to
call myself a dreamer within a dream that dreams me: and
I must perforce allow it to dream me. The more I
"allow" the dream to dream me – that is to say, the more I
come into accord with the perception available to me as a human being
– the more I facilitate communication between myself and the rest of reality.
Increasing such communication causes me to "influence"
reality – but such influence is not necessarily to my, or anyone
else's, immediate benefit. Indeed, the dream seems to become
more persistently uneasy as I go along, not only because of my
increased knowledge with regard to its political and sociological
actualities, but because of my own evolving awareness as to how I
experience – and experientially influence – those actualities.
The only "benefit" I can claim to derive from my
understanding comes solely through increasing the possibility of some
form of "waking up" from the dream – though this
"waking up" may in fact simply be a matter of my perfecting
my ability to exist as a dreamer within a dream.
*
*
*
|
If I'm up in your face and I call you an ignorant clown,
You'll say, "Who died and made you boss?" and
"Who do you think that you are?"
In this modern world each person's opinion is valid;
What else can I do but turn my back on you all?
Argue your ethics, your morals, your faith, your science, your law;
A cult's not a cult if it's held by majority view.
The ancients would tell you, "You're close, but you miss by a mile";
They'd be up in your face, they would shout, "Who are you? Who
are you?" |
|